blessings. and a few curses, too.
Home    Info
About: a place to share.

"Spin Madly On" theme by Margarette Bacani. Powered by Tumblr.
“For the record, ‘abortion services’ make up 3% of total services provided by Planned Parenthood. Cancer screening and prevention? 16%.”
thedailywhat:

This Is All Kinds Of Wrong of the Day: After years of partnering with Planned Parenthood to offer low-income patients access to life-saving breast cancer screenings, Susan G. Komen for the Cure — a breast-cancer charity that has been known to sue small charities for using “for the cure” in their names — announced yesterday it would no longer fund those screenings.
The alleged reason? A newly instituted rule at Komen “that prohibits grants to organizations being investigated by local, state or federal authorities.”
While a congressional investigation against Planned Parenthood was launched by Florida Republican Cliff Stearns — a staunchly pro-life politician who called defunding Planned Parenthood a “fiscal and moral priority” — many supporters of Komen are failing to see the connection between abortions and breast-cancer screenings.
However, things get considerably clearer once it becomes known that Komen recently appointed Karen Handel, an “anti-choice” Georgia Republican who promised to defund Planned Parenthood, to serve as its SVP.
Taking Komen’s excuse — which includes the line “we must continue to evolve to best meet the needs of the women we serve and most fully advance our mission” — on its face becomes problematic when considering that all of the money granted to Planned Parenthood by Komen was being used to provide screenings to uninsured or underinsured women.
For the record, “abortion services” make up 3% of total services provided by Planned Parenthood. Cancer screening and prevention? 16%.
How can Komen claim to be acting in the best interest of women when it is actively denying many of them access to life-saving breast-cancer screenings that can’t get anywhere else? That’s what many on Komen’s Facebook page and message board would like to know.
They have been leaving angry messages denouncing Komen’s action since the news broke. Many are putting their pocketbook where their fingers are and donating money to Planned Parenthood that would have gone to Komen.
Over the past 24 hours Planned Parenthood has raised “hundreds of thousands” of dollars, and may have already surpassed the amount it would have received from Komen.
[photo: metro.]
See Also: Give Komen the Pink Slip: Five Ways to Support Women’s Health for All.

“For the record, ‘abortion services’ make up 3% of total services provided by Planned Parenthood. Cancer screening and prevention? 16%.”

thedailywhat:

This Is All Kinds Of Wrong of the Day: After years of partnering with Planned Parenthood to offer low-income patients access to life-saving breast cancer screenings, Susan G. Komen for the Cure — a breast-cancer charity that has been known to sue small charities for using “for the cure” in their names — announced yesterday it would no longer fund those screenings.

The alleged reason? A newly instituted rule at Komen “that prohibits grants to organizations being investigated by local, state or federal authorities.”

While a congressional investigation against Planned Parenthood was launched by Florida Republican Cliff Stearns — a staunchly pro-life politician who called defunding Planned Parenthood a “fiscal and moral priority” — many supporters of Komen are failing to see the connection between abortions and breast-cancer screenings.

However, things get considerably clearer once it becomes known that Komen recently appointed Karen Handel, an “anti-choice” Georgia Republican who promised to defund Planned Parenthood, to serve as its SVP.

Taking Komen’s excuse — which includes the line “we must continue to evolve to best meet the needs of the women we serve and most fully advance our mission” — on its face becomes problematic when considering that all of the money granted to Planned Parenthood by Komen was being used to provide screenings to uninsured or underinsured women.

For the record, “abortion services” make up 3% of total services provided by Planned Parenthood. Cancer screening and prevention? 16%.

How can Komen claim to be acting in the best interest of women when it is actively denying many of them access to life-saving breast-cancer screenings that can’t get anywhere else? That’s what many on Komen’s Facebook page and message board would like to know.

They have been leaving angry messages denouncing Komen’s action since the news broke. Many are putting their pocketbook where their fingers are and donating money to Planned Parenthood that would have gone to Komen.

Over the past 24 hours Planned Parenthood has raised “hundreds of thousands” of dollars, and may have already surpassed the amount it would have received from Komen.

[photo: metro.]

See Also: Give Komen the Pink Slip: Five Ways to Support Women’s Health for All.

(Source: thedailywhat)

  1. sillylori reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  2. newtrancher reblogged this from fromonesurvivortoanother
  3. lindsaymackay reblogged this from thedailywhat
  4. nickel-colie reblogged this from etoile-et-toile
  5. ah-theisoscelestriangle reblogged this from thedailywhat
  6. francelkie reblogged this from suchaklutz
  7. barktherandom reblogged this from thedailywhat
  8. winnyee reblogged this from stephuchino
  9. twolittlefeet reblogged this from brandibee32
  10. baritonepats reblogged this from stephuchino
  11. stephuchino reblogged this from clurrforsure
  12. suchaklutz reblogged this from thedailywhat
  13. nakedeye reblogged this from thedailywhat
  14. joelyamiugly reblogged this from princesspandulce and added:
    FINALLY THE KOMEN FOUNDATION NOW FUNDS PLANNED PARENTHOOD AGAIN! THANKS TO ALL THIS PUBLICITY AND COMPLAINTS DIRECTLY TO...
  15. thecandimafiaboss reblogged this from saffronsugar
  16. darkandtwistyrandomness reblogged this from thedailywhat
  17. solocaracol reblogged this from unnecessaryemotion
  18. youmakemefat reblogged this from chinesenapaj
  19. loves-anodyne reblogged this from theoppressedlittlefetus
  20. libidinousnarwhal reblogged this from tinaalsgirl
  21. lesbrarianinprogress reblogged this from thedailywhat
  22. cameheretodrinkmilkandkickass reblogged this from jagara
  23. yes-ikan reblogged this from thedailywhat
  24. infiniteinfaculties reblogged this from damnsweetpotatoes
  25. angrywatermelon reblogged this from takaminas
  26. shesaysnothing reblogged this from valjeanvaljean and added:
    Ignoring all the inappropriate gifs… I so agree that this is wrong. I’m pro-life but I also see all the good that...
  27. jdotcole reblogged this from thedailywhat
  28. theywontstfu reblogged this from thedailywhat
  29. batsyy reblogged this from calibornsbottombitch
  30. thedailywhat posted this